g y
1 1 23
2 1 30
3 1 25
4 2 33
5 2 36
6 2 41
7 2 37
8 2 43
9 3 24
10 3 29
11 3 31
Define
g y
1 1 23
2 1 30
3 1 25
4 2 33
5 2 36
6 2 41
7 2 37
8 2 43
9 3 24
10 3 29
11 3 31
“Sixty-six women with osteoporosis were alternately assigned to one of three treatment groups: Group 1 (n=22), group 2 (n=22), and controls (n=22). After 6 weeks, the change in bone mineral density from baseline was measured. Analysis with one-way ANOVA indicated a statistically significant difference between the groups (F_2,63=61.07, P < 0.001). Further analysis with Tukey’s pair-wise comparison procedure to control for multiple testing revealed that the mean change (+/- SD) of group 2 (1.6 g/cm^2 +/-0.2) was significantly greater than that of group 1 (1.1 g/cm^2 +/- 0.2) and that of the controls (1.0 g/cm^2 +/- 0.2) with an overall alpha level of 0.05.”
“Sixty-six women with osteoporosis were alternately assigned to one of three treatment groups: Group 1 (n=22), group 2 (n=22), and controls (n=22). After 6 weeks, the change in bone mineral density from baseline was measured. Analysis with one-way ANOVA indicated a statistically significant difference between the groups (F_2,63=61.07, P < 0.001). Further analysis with Tukey’s pair-wise comparison procedure to control for multiple testing revealed that the mean change (+/- SD) of group 2 (1.6 g/cm^2 +/-0.2) was significantly greater than that of group 1 (1.1 g/cm^2 +/- 0.2) and that of the controls (1.0 g/cm^2 +/- 0.2) with an overall alpha level of 0.05.”
“Sixty-six women with osteoporosis were alternately assigned to one of three treatment groups: Group 1 (n=22), group 2 (n=22), and controls (n=22). After 6 weeks, the change in bone mineral density from baseline was measured. Analysis with one-way ANOVA indicated a statistically significant difference between the groups (F_2,63=61.07, P < 0.001). Further analysis with Tukey’s pair-wise comparison procedure to control for multiple testing revealed that the mean change (+/- SD) of group 2 (1.6 g/cm^2 +/-0.2) was significantly greater than that of group 1 (1.1 g/cm^2 +/- 0.2) and that of the controls (1.0 g/cm^2 +/- 0.2) with an overall alpha level of 0.05.”
“Sixty-six women with osteoporosis were alternately assigned to one of three treatment groups: Group 1 (n=22), group 2 (n=22), and controls (n=22). After 6 weeks, the change in bone mineral density from baseline was measured. Analysis with one-way ANOVA indicated a statistically significant difference between the groups (F_2,63=61.07, P < 0.001). Further analysis with Tukey’s pair-wise comparison procedure to control for multiple testing revealed that the mean change (+/- SD) of group 2 (1.6 g/cm^2 +/-0.2) was significantly greater than that of group 1 (1.1 g/cm^2 +/- 0.2) and that of the controls (1.0 g/cm^2 +/- 0.2) with an overall alpha level of 0.05.”
“Sixty-six women with osteoporosis were alternately assigned to one of three treatment groups: Group 1 (n=22), group 2 (n=22), and controls (n=22). After 6 weeks, the change in bone mineral density from baseline was measured. Analysis with one-way ANOVA indicated a statistically significant difference between the groups (F_2,63=61.07, P < 0.001). Further analysis with Tukey’s pair-wise comparison procedure to control for multiple testing revealed that the mean change (+/- SD) of group 2 (1.6 g/cm^2 +/-0.2) was significantly greater than that of group 1 (1.1 g/cm^2 +/- 0.2) and that of the controls (1.0 g/cm^2 +/- 0.2) with an overall alpha level of 0.05.”
“Sixty-six women with osteoporosis were alternately assigned to one of three treatment groups: Group 1 (n=22), group 2 (n=22), and controls (n=22). After 6 weeks, the change in bone mineral density from baseline was measured. Analysis with one-way ANOVA indicated a statistically significant difference between the groups (F_2,63=61.07, P < 0.001). Further analysis with Tukey’s pair-wise comparison procedure to control for multiple testing revealed that the mean change (+/- SD) of group 2 (1.6 g/cm^2 +/-0.2) was significantly greater than that of group 1 (1.1 g/cm^2 +/- 0.2) and that of the controls (1.0 g/cm^2 +/- 0.2) with an overall alpha level of 0.05.”
“Sixty-six women with osteoporosis were alternately assigned to one of three treatment groups: Group 1 (n=22), group 2 (n=22), and controls (n=22). After 6 weeks, the change in bone mineral density from baseline was measured. Analysis with one-way ANOVA indicated a statistically significant difference between the groups (F_2,63=61.07, P < 0.001). Further analysis with Tukey’s pair-wise comparison procedure to control for multiple testing revealed that the mean change (+/- SD) of group 2 (1.6 g/cm^2 +/-0.2) was significantly greater than that of group 1 (1.1 g/cm^2 +/- 0.2) and that of the controls (1.0 g/cm^2 +/- 0.2) with an overall alpha level of 0.05.”
“Sixty-six women with osteoporosis were alternately assigned to one of three treatment groups: Group 1 (n=22), group 2 (n=22), and controls (n=22). After 6 weeks, the change in bone mineral density from baseline was measured. Analysis with one-way ANOVA indicated a statistically significant difference between the groups (F_2,63=61.07, P < 0.001). Further analysis with Tukey’s pair-wise comparison procedure to control for multiple testing revealed that the mean change (+/- SD) of group 2 (1.6 g/cm^2 +/-0.2) was significantly greater than that of group 1 (1.1 g/cm^2 +/- 0.2) and that of the controls (1.0 g/cm^2 +/- 0.2) with an overall alpha level of 0.05.”
“Sixty-six women with osteoporosis were alternately assigned to one of three treatment groups: Group 1 (n=22), group 2 (n=22), and controls (n=22). After 6 weeks, the change in bone mineral density from baseline was measured. Analysis with one-way ANOVA indicated a statistically significant difference between the groups (F_2,63=61.07, P < 0.001). Further analysis with Tukey’s pair-wise comparison procedure to control for multiple testing revealed that the mean change (+/- SD) of group 2 (1.6 g/cm^2 +/-0.2) was significantly greater than that of group 1 (1.1 g/cm^2 +/- 0.2) and that of the controls (1.0 g/cm^2 +/- 0.2) with an overall alpha level of 0.05.”
“To shorten the time it takes him tomake his favorite pizza, a student designed an experiment to test the effect of sugar and milk on the activation times for baking yeast. Specifically, he tested four different recipes and measured how many seconds it took for the same amount of dough to rise to the top of a bowl. He randomized the order of the recipes and replicated each treatment 4 times.”